Satisfaction with Control of Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis with Ruxolitinib Cream: US Physician and Patient Perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: The 2021 US approval of ruxolitinib cream for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in patients aged ≥ 12 years was based on the results of two pivotal phase 3 studies. Currently, real-world data to describe effectiveness of ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment remain limited. Our objective is to describe disease control among adults with mild to moderate AD prescribed ruxolitinib cream and physician satisfaction with treatment. METHODS: Data were from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™, a US real-world, cross-sectional survey of physician-reported data, undertaken between August 2022 and March 2023. For patients aged ≥ 18 years, physicians reported patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and physician satisfaction with disease control. Descriptive analysis of data for patients with mild to moderate AD prior to the initiation of ruxolitinib cream and treated with ruxolitinib cream for ≥ 1 month was undertaken. RESULTS: Among physician-reported data from 1360 patients with AD, 149 patients had received ruxolitinib cream (in combination or as monotherapy) for ≥ 1 month, including 59 patients receiving monotherapy. Prior to treatment with ruxolitinib cream, 84.6% of patients had moderate AD (Investigator's Global Assessment, IGA of 3), whereas after treatment (median duration, 26 weeks), only 21.5% had an IGA of 3, with 48.3% of patients having clear or almost clear skin (IGA of 0/1). For these patients, 81.2% were not currently experiencing a flare, and physicians were satisfied with disease control for 87.3%. Results were similar in patients receiving monotherapy. The most frequent physician-reported reasons for prescribing ruxolitinib cream included relieving itch, improving lesion redness/thickness, achieving disease control, and reducing/controlling flares. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings demonstrate effective disease control and physician satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of AD in adults in a clinical practice setting. Outcomes were similar whether ruxolitinib cream was prescribed as monotherapy or in combination regimens, suggesting a role for ruxolitinib cream across the spectrum of disease.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a disease in which skin can be itchy, inflamed, and cracked. Traditional therapies for mild to moderate AD can be limited by side effects and long-term safety issues. After US approval of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of mild to moderate AD in 2021, the goal of this study was to describe disease control and doctor satisfaction with ruxolitinib cream in a real-world setting. The Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme™ surveyed 159 doctors who treated people with AD between August 2022 and March 2023. Doctors reported records from 1360 patients with mild to moderate AD. In these patients, ruxolitinib cream was used for at least 1 month in 149 patients and was used alone in 59 patients. Before the use of ruxolitinib cream, nearly 85% of the 149 patients had moderate AD. After the use of ruxolitinib cream, about 20% had moderate AD, with half having clear or almost clear skin. About 80% were not currently experiencing flares. Doctors were satisfied with disease control in more than 85% of patients. Patients applying ruxolitinib cream alone had similar results. Doctors most often prescribed ruxolitinib cream for itch relief, disease control, and to reduce or control flares. In summary, when ruxolitinib cream was used by patients, it provided good disease control, and doctors were satisfied with results. Outcomes were similar in patients who applied ruxolitinib cream alone or with another treatment. This suggests that ruxolitinib cream may be useful for patients with AD of differing levels of severity.

Real-World Experience of Adalimumab Biosimilar (ABP 501) Use in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Europe.

INTRODUCTION: Approval of adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 (Amgevita®) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was based upon the principle of extrapolation. Real-world experience of ABP 501 utilization in IBD can provide useful information to healthcare providers and patients. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2020-2021 Adelphi IBD Disease Specific Programme™ conducted in five major European countries. Participating gastroenterologists completed a point-in-time survey to provide patient medical record data, and patients voluntarily completed questionnaires to report health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Descriptive analyses were conducted for "ABP 501 initiators" (received ABP 501 as first advanced therapy) and "RP-ABP 501 switchers" (switched to ABP 501 from reference product [RP; Humira®] as first advanced therapy). RESULTS: This analysis included 239 ABP 501 initiators and 136 RP-ABP 501 switchers. At consultation, initiators had been on ABP 501 treatment for a median of 7.5 months and switchers had received ABP 501 for a median of 7.7 months following the switch from a median of 14.0 months treatment with RP. About 74% of initiators and 89% of switchers were reported by their treating physicians as being in clinical remission. Physicians and patients reported satisfaction with ABP 501 in the range of 92-99% across both groups. Patient self-assessment, including EuroQol visual analogue scale, Short IBD Questionnaire, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scores, suggested minimal impairment of HRQoL while on ABP 501. The most common reason for RP to ABP 501 switch was lower healthcare costs. CONCLUSION: Both patients with IBD and treating physicians reported high levels of satisfaction with ABP 501 among initiators and switchers.

ABP 501 (Amgevita^®) is the first approved biosimilar to adalimumab originator (Humira^®), referred to here as the reference product. A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to its reference product in terms of safety, purity, and effectiveness. ABP 501 has been approved for the treatment of certain chronic inflammatory diseases. The approval of ABP 501 for inflammatory disease is based upon the principle of extrapolation, with no clinical trial being conducted in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therefore, in this current study, we evaluated the utilization experience of biosimilar ABP 501 in the real-world setting from both physicians' and patients' perspectives. We reported that patients with inflammatory bowel disease who initiated ABP 501 as the first advanced therapy as well as patients who continued therapy on ABP 501 after a switch from the adalimumab reference product both had a high level of satisfaction when using the biosimilar ABP 501. Treating physicians also reported that most of their patients were in clinical remission while on treatment with ABP 501, and patients themselves reported minimal impairment of health-related quality of life.

The power of hope: Views of Ovarian Cancer patients on how maintenance therapy Affects their Lives (VOCAL).

Aim: To assess maintenance preference and trade-offs for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods: Patients completed a time trade-off exercise ranking five maintenance approaches. Patients' preferred approach was compared with alternatives to determine the progression-free time they would trade off to remain on their preferred approach. Results: Of 152 patients (median age 53 years, 68% White), 56% chose one of four maintenance medications, mostly to feel proactive and 44% chose active surveillance. Compared with their preferred approach, patients were willing to trade a mean progression-free time before switching of 2.3 months for once-daily oral medications, 3.2 months for twice-daily oral medications, 5.5 months for intravenous infusions every 3 weeks (iv. q3), 6.1 months for active surveillance and 7.5 months for iv. q3 and twice-daily oral. Conclusion: Findings highlight the importance of patients' awareness of all maintenance approaches and involving them in the decision-making process.

What is the article about? The VOCAL study looked at maintenance approach preferences of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Maintenance approach refers to the methods used after a patient has completed their initial chemotherapy to prevent disease progression for as long as possible. US patients completed an online survey, ranking five different maintenance approaches: No medication (active surveillance); Once-daily oral medication (e.g. pills); Twice-daily oral medication; Medication by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks; Medication by intravenous infusion every 3 weeks and oral twice-daily. Patients were asked to assume the same time to disease progression for all five approaches and the same side effects for the four approaches involving medications (2­5). Each patient then indicated how much time to disease progression they were willing to trade off to remain on their preferred approach before switching to an alternative. What were the results? Overall, 152 patients completed the survey (median age: 53 years, 68% White). Most patients preferred a medication approach (56%, n = 85) to active surveillance (44%, n = 67). Of the 85 patients who preferred medication, 66% (n = 56) reported this was to feel proactive in preventing their cancer returning. Once-daily oral medication was the most acceptable alternative to the patients' preferred maintenance approach, given they were willing to trade the least 'disease-free' time (2.3 months) before accepting a switch. What do the results mean? Individual patient preferences vary, and healthcare professionals should work with patients to determine which approach is most appropriate for them.

Degree of Alignment Between Japanese Patients and Physicians on Alopecia Areata Disease Severity and Treatment Satisfaction: A Real-World Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is characterized by non-scarring scalp and/or body hair loss and can negatively impact patient mental health. Data are limited on the alignment of patient and physician perceptions of AA severity with each other and with Japanese Dermatological Association (JDA) guideline criteria, and of patient-physician alignment on treatment satisfaction. Therefore, we performed analyses to compare JDA severity groupings with patient-physician alignment on disease severity and to explore treatment satisfaction in AA in Japan. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi AA Disease Specific Programme (DSP)™, a real-world survey of physicians and patients with AA in Japan conducted January-March 2021. Patients and physicians reported patient AA severity as mild, moderate or severe based on their subjective judgement. Patients were then categorized into five hair loss severity groups according to JDA criteria (S1-5), and patient-physician pairs were matched to assess alignment on severity and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Subjective patient- and physician-reported disease severity generally followed JDA severity groupings. The percentage of patient-physician alignment on severity recognition was 76.3% in the overall population. In misaligned pairs, 20.2%, 14.5%, 7.3%, 25.0% and 0.0% of physicians rated disease as more severe than patients in S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5, respectively. Regarding treatment satisfaction, patient-physician alignment was 57.6% in the overall population. In S5, 46.2% of physicians reported being less satisfied than patients. Both physicians and patients cited lack of efficacy as the main reason for dissatisfaction. Of 221 patients, 39.8% and 29.9% were categorized as borderline-abnormal cases for anxiety and depression, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights previously unreported patient-physician misalignment on disease severity, level of treatment dissatisfaction and unmet needs due to the lack of effective treatment. Further study on how improvement of the misalignment between physicians and patients could increase both patient and physician satisfaction with treatment and improve the quality of life for patients with AA.

Real-world evidence generation from patients, their caregivers and physicians supporting clinical, regulatory and guideline decisions: an update on Disease Specific Programmes.

OBJECTIVE: To update on and describe the role of Disease Specific Programmes (DSPs), a multi-perspective real-world data (RWD) source, in the context of the evolution of the value and acceptance of real-world evidence (RWE) in clinical, regulatory and guideline decision-making. METHODS: DSPs are multi-national, multi-subscriber, multi-therapy cross-sectional surveys incorporating retrospective data collection from patient, caregiver and physician perspectives. Information collected covers the patient journey, including treatment/prescribing patterns and rationale, patient-reported outcomes, impact on work and everyday activities, attitudes towards and perceptions of the condition, adherence to treatment and burden of illness. Published peer-reviewed DSP papers were aligned with current key RWE themes identified in the literature, alongside their contribution to RWE. RESULTS: RWE themes examined were: using RWE to inform clinical practice, patient and caregiver engagement, RWE role in supporting health technology assessments and regulatory submissions, informing value-driven healthcare decisions, real-world patient subgroup differences and therapeutic inertia/unmet needs; highlighting patients' and caregivers' experience of living with a disease, disconnect from their physicians, unmet needs and educational gaps. CONCLUSIONS: DSPs provide a wealth of RWD in addition to evidence generated by registries, clinical trials and observational research, with wide use for the pharmaceutical industry, government, funding/regulatory bodies, clinical practice guideline insights and, most importantly, informing improvements in people's lives. The depth, breadth and heritage of information collected via DSPs since 1995 is unparalleled, extending understanding of how diseases are managed by physicians in routine clinical practice and why treatment choices are made, patients' perceptions of their disease management, and caregiver burden.

Cross-walk of the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (CLDQ-NASH) and the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L in patients with NASH.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a chronic progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, which can negatively impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected individuals. HRQoL in NASH has been assessed using the disease-specific Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire for NASH (CLDQ-NASH) and the generic EuroQol EQ-5D-5L. As the performance of these instruments relative to each other is unknown, we performed a cross-walk analysis of CLDQ-NASH to EQ-5D-5L using data from a real-world NASH population. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World 2019 NASH Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey of physicians and their patients in the United States. Patients with physician-diagnosed NASH completed a questionnaire that included the CLDQ-NASH and EQ-5D-5L. Mapping from CLDQ-NASH to EQ-5D-5L was done using tenfold cross-validation; performance was assessed using root-mean squared error as accuracy measure. Subgroup analyses compared performance of the models in obese versus non-obese patients and patients with versus without type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESULTS: Data from 347 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, 2172 models were tested for predicting EQ-5D-5L index score from CLDQ-NASH score. The best model for this mapping was a generalized linear model using Gaussian distribution and a power link. The best model for mapping from CLDQ-NASH domains to the EQ-5D-5L was a fractional logistic model. Models performed better at predicting upper versus lower values of EQ-5D-5L, for non-obese versus obese patients, and for patients without versus with T2D. CONCLUSION: We describe a scoring algorithm for cross-walking the CLDQ-NASH to the EQ-5D-5L enabling health status comparisons of HRQoL across studies.

Suboptimal Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes in Patients with Psoriasis Undertreated with Oral Therapies: International Physician and Patient Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, immune-mediated disease. This study assessed the time at which patients switched from a conventional oral systemic treatment to a biologic therapy; patient clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes associated with oral systemic treatments; and the proportion of patients who persisted on oral therapy (nonswitchers), despite reported suboptimal clinical and QoL outcomes. METHODS: This data analysis used the Adelphi Real World Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme, a non-interventional, retrospective, cross-sectional survey conducted in the USA, France, Germany, and United Kingdom (August 2018-April 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis assessed switching from oral to biologic therapy in patients treated ≥ 3 years at survey completion (n = 597). The severity of psoriasis was reported by physicians as the percentage of body surface area (BSA) affected by psoriasis. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were calculated for three groups: nonswitchers who met treatment failure criteria, nonswitchers who did not meet failure criteria, and switchers to a biologic therapy. RESULTS: In KM analysis, approximately 50% of the patient population switched by 24 months. A substantial portion of nonswitchers continued to have moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Among nonswitchers, 57-77% had BSA ≥ 3% and 16-24% had BSA ≥ 10% at the time of the survey compared with 37% of switchers who had BSA of ≥ 3% and 9% who had BSA of ≥ 10%. QoL was poor among nonswitchers. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] DLQI scores for nonswitchers meeting treatment failure criteria, nonswitchers not meeting failure criteria, and switchers were 6.11 (4.55), 2.62 (3.29), and 2.25 (4.23), respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a clear unmet need for more effective oral therapies, and further research into the reasons for patients remaining undertreated, which may include patient preference for oral treatments (despite lack of response), contraindications, or insurance/formulary-related barriers to access, are needed.

Psoriasis is a common skin disease that causes itchy, painful, scaly sores. Patients may feel stigmatized, which can impact their quality of life and productivity. About 1 in 5 patients have severe psoriasis, which is harder to treat and may require pills or shots. Both shots and pills are effective at treating psoriasis; however, many patients choose to continue taking pills, even if their psoriasis worsens, for reasons including a desire to avoid needles. We described patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who started on pills and either remained on pills or switched to shots by the time of the survey. We looked at the reasons they gave for switching, as well as at quality of life measures reported by the patients. To do this, we analyzed data from a survey called the Adelphi Real World Psoriasis Disease Specific Programme. This survey was conducted among doctors who treat skin diseases and their patients. Participating doctors and patients from the USA, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom were asked questions about the patients' health and how psoriasis affects their lives. Survey results showed that nearly half of patients switched to shots by 24 months, and most who switched cited treatment failure as the reason. Those who continued to take their pills despite having more severe psoriasis symptoms had more itching and pain and had lower quality of life than those who switched to shots. This suggests that there is a need for more effective oral treatments for patients with psoriasis.

Alignment of Physician-Stated vs Clinically Derived Reference Fibrosis Score in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Real-World European Survey.

Objective: Stratifying disease severity in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is essential for appropriate treatment and long-term management. Liver biopsy is the reference standard for fibrosis severity in NASH, but less invasive methods are used, eg, Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE), for which reference thresholds for no/early fibrosis and advanced fibrosis are available. We compared subjective physician assessment of NASH fibrosis versus reference thresholds to understand classification in a real-world setting. Methods: Data were drawn from Adelphi Real World NASH Disease Specific ProgrammeTM conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and UK in 2018. Physicians (diabetologists, gastroenterologists, hepatologists) completed questionnaires for five consecutive NASH patients presenting for routine care. Physician-stated fibrosis score (PSFS) based on available information was compared with clinically defined reference fibrosis stage (CRFS) determined retrospectively using VCTE and FIB-4 data and eight reference thresholds. Results: One thousand two hundred and eleven patients had VCTE (n = 1115) and/or FIB-4 (n = 524). Depending on thresholds, physicians underestimated severity in 16-33% (FIB-4) and 27-50% of patients (VCTE). Using VCTE ≥12.2, diabetologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists underestimated disease severity in 35%, 32%, and 27% of patients, respectively, and overestimated fibrosis in 3%, 4%, and 9%, respectively (p = 0.0083 across specialties). Hepatologists and gastroenterologists had higher liver biopsy rates than diabetologists (52%, 56%, 47%, respectively). Conclusion: PSFS did not consistently align with CRFS in this NASH real-world setting. Underestimation was more common than overestimation, potentially leading to undertreatment of patients with advanced fibrosis. More guidance on interpreting test results when classifying fibrosis is needed, thereby improving management of NASH.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of patients with RA: a survey of rheumatologists in six European countries.

Objective: We aimed to describe, from the perspective of rheumatologists in Europe, how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted their management of people with RA and the continuing medical education of physicians. Methods: Rheumatologists participating in the Adelphi RA Disease Specific ProgrammeTM in six European countries were contacted in August and September 2020 for a telephone survey. Rheumatologists were asked seven attitudinal questions on changes to patient management, prescription behaviour and continuing education owing to COVID-19. Results were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results: The telephone survey was completed by 284 rheumatologists. The most commonly reported changes to patient management were increased utilization of video/telephone consultations (66.5% of respondents), fewer visits (58.5%) and limiting physical contact (58.1%). Furthermore, 67.9% of rheumatologists who indicated that prescribing behaviour had changed switched their patients to self-administered medication, and 60.7% reported not starting patients on targeted synthetic DMARDs, biologic originator DMARDs or biosimilar DMARDs. In total, 57.6% of rheumatologists believed that changes in management would persist. Rheumatologists reported that 38.0% of patients expressed concerns about how COVID-19 would impact treatment, including access to treatment and the risk of infection. The biggest impact on rheumatologist education was a switch to online training and conferences. Conclusion: All countries saw changes in patient management and prescribing behaviour, including the rapid uptake of telemedicine. It is important that the international rheumatology community learns from these experiences to prepare better for future pandemics and to address ongoing rheumatologist shortages.

Impact of Patient and Physician Disconnect on Satisfaction with Treatment for Atopic Dermatitis in Japan.

INTRODUCTION: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory disease causing severe skin itching. Data on patient-physician disconnect on treatment satisfaction in patients with AD in Japan are limited. We investigated patient-physician disconnect on treatment satisfaction in AD and if it influences treatment patterns, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme (DSP), a real-world, point-in-time survey of physicians and patients with AD conducted in Japan from April to July 2019. Patients and physicians were grouped according to level of treatment satisfaction ("extremely satisfied" to "extremely dissatisfied"); with any level of dissatisfaction recorded as "less than satisfied." Data were collected on treatment patterns, clinical characteristics, and PROs including the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Data were provided by 184 patients with AD and 56 physicians; 72.8% of patient-physician pairs reported a fair (kappa coefficient: 0.40) level of agreement on treatment satisfaction, 51.6% of patient-physician pairs were both satisfied, and 21.2% were both less than satisfied. Satisfied physicians prescribed a mean 1.2 fewer treatments than dissatisfied physicians (p < 0.05). Cases where both physician and patient were less than satisfied or where patients were less satisfied than their physicians reported the worst PROs, DLQI (both less than satisfied: mean 10.7 versus patient less satisfied than physician: 10.6 versus overall: 7.9), POEM (19.5 versus 17.3 versus 17.0), EQ-5D-3L (0.82 versus 0.81 versus 0.87) (all, p < 0.05). Work impairment was highest when both patient and physician were less than satisfied (p < 0.05). Physicians cited treatment efficacy and patients cited efficacy and usability as main reasons for dissatisfaction. CONCLUSION: Overall, 12.0% of patients were less satisfied with their AD treatment than the physician, demonstrating some of the worst PROs, suggesting unmet need that could be improved by better patient-physician communication.

Physician- and patient-reported symptom concordance and association with quality of life in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Aim: To investigate the association of discordance in patient- and physician-reported symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients & methods: Data were drawn from a point-in-time survey of physicians and patients conducted in Germany, Italy and Spain (October 2018 - January 2019). Physicians and their consulting patients independently reported baseline characteristics, symptoms, treatment history and satisfaction, and HRQoL derived using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire. Results: Of 486 patients analysed, tiredness (73.3%, 73.7%), pain/aches (67.7%, 66.9%) and weight/appetite loss (54.3%, 53.7%) were the most common and concordant patient and physician-reported symptom domains, respectively. The symptom domains showing the largest discordance were reflux/indigestion (14.6%, 5.1%), neurological (11.9%, 5.6%), dermatological (9.3%, 6.2%) symptoms and jaundice (4.7%, 10.3%). Reduced HRQoL was observed with increasing symptom-reporting discordance. Conclusion: Further studies should investigate how symptom-reporting discordance influences patient satisfaction and HRQoL.

Qualitative Interviews to Support Development and Cognitive Debriefing of the Adelphi Adherence Questionnaire (ADAQ©): A Patient-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence Developed for Use in a Range of Diseases, Treatment Modalities, and Countries.

Purpose: The Adelphi Adherence Questionnaire (ADAQ©) is a newly developed generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment of medication adherence. The aim was to assess its content validity by conducting cognitive debriefing (CD) interviews with patients prescribed medication(s) of various treatment modalities in a range of therapy areas. Materials and Methods: Targeted literature/instrument review and concept elicitation interviews informed development of the ADAQ©. CD interviews were conducted with 57 adults from the United States of America (USA; n = 21), Spain (n = 18), and Germany (n = 18) who prescribed medication for hypertension, diabetes, depression, schizophrenia, asthma, multiple myeloma, psoriasis, and/or multiple sclerosis. Interviews were conducted in two rounds to explore the relevance and understanding of the item wording, instructions, recall period and response options. Verbatim transcripts were analysed in ATLAS.Ti using thematic analysis. Three expert clinicians provided guidance throughout the study. Results: ADAQ© items/instructions were well understood and relevant to participants. Key modifications following round 1 included revising instructions to refer to current medication(s) for one condition to reduce cognitive burden, removing two items with lower relevance (specifically those assessing running out of medication and social discouragement), and adding a response option for participants to indicate if they had stopped taking a medication. Minor wording modifications were made following round 2. Subgroup differences in item relevance were explored based on clinical characteristics. Cost of medication was more relevant amongst US participants. Conclusion: Content validity of the ADAQ© was confirmed in demographically and clinically diverse participants. Psychometric properties of the ADAQ© will be explored in future studies.

Impact of itch and skin pain on quality of life in adult patients with atopic dermatitis in Japan: results from a real-world, point-in-time, survey of physicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE: Itch is a common symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD), however, there is limited evidence of the frequency and association of skin pain alongside itch. This study assessed the incremental dual burden and impact of itch and skin pain on satisfaction, quality of life and work productivity in patients with AD in Japan. METHODS: Data were drawn from the 2020 Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists (n = 56) and their patients with history of moderate/severe AD (n = 265). Patients were grouped accordingly: no itch/skin pain (No I/SP, reference group, n = 89), itch/no skin pain (I-only, n = 71), and itch and skin pain (I + SP, n = 26). Descriptive analyses were performed alongside a range of regression models, dependent on outcome variables. RESULTS: I + SP patients had a 4.97-point worse POEM score (p = .005) and 14.5% more overall work impairment (p = .034) versus the reference group. I-only and I + SP patients were 8.92 and 23.5 times more likely, respectively, to experience sleep disruption on a day-to-day basis (both p < .001). I + SP patients were 4.6 times more likely to be bothered by their symptoms (p = .034), had a mean EASI score 6.7 points higher (p = .008) and had 1.39 more areas affected (p = .001). I + SP patients were 7.26 times more likely to express dissatisfaction with lack of improvement in their condition and 8 times more likely to be dissatisfied with convenience of treatment (both p < .05). CONCLUSION: This dissatisfaction, alongside variations in reported symptomatic burdens, suggests that physicians could consider alternative and/or novel therapeutic approaches for the management of both itch and skin pain.

Patients with atopic dermatitis experience a broad range of symptoms, including both itch and skin pain, however it is not clear how these symptoms combine to impact patients in everyday life. This survey of 56 dermatologists and 265 patients with a history of moderate or severe atopic dermatitis investigated the impact of both itch and skin pain on quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Japan. Patients were categorised into three groups depending on the presence of these symptoms; patients with either no itch or skin pain, patients with itch but no skin pain, or patients with both itch and skin pain. These three groups were then compared. Patients with both itch and skin pain reported this combination of symptoms together impacted on their daily lives more than patients with itch but no skin pain, or no itch or skin pain. In particular, patients with both itch and skin pain had more areas of their body affected and reported being more bothered by their symptoms compared to those who did not experience these symptoms, with daily work impairment, sleep disruption and quality of life all worse. Importantly, patients with both itch and skin pain were more likely to be dissatisfied with the lack of improvement in their condition and with the convenience of their treatment. These results suggest that physicians should take into consideration the presence of both itch and skin pain when making treatment decisions in atopic dermatitis, and the need to consider treatments to target both symptoms.

Effect of Fatigue on Health-Related Quality of Life and Work Productivity in Psoriatic Arthritis: Findings From a Real-World Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate fatigue frequency and severity among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and assess the effect of fatigue severity on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) assessing quality of life, function, and work productivity. METHODS: Data were derived from the Adelphi Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2018 in the United States and Europe. Patients had physician-confirmed PsA. Fatigue was collected as a binary variable and through its severity (0-10 scale, using the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease fatigue question) from patients; physicians also reported patient fatigue (yes/no). Other PROMs included the 5-level EuroQol 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) for health-related quality of life (HRQOL), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire. Multivariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between fatigue severity and other PROMs. RESULTS: Among the 831 included patients (mean age 47.5 yrs, mean disease duration 5.3 yrs, 46.9% female, 48.1% receiving a biologic), fatigue was reported by 78.3% of patients. Patients with greater fatigue severity had greater disease duration, PsA severity, pain levels, body surface area affected by psoriasis, and swollen and tender joint counts (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analyses, patients with greater fatigue severity experienced worse physical functioning, HRQOL, and work productivity (all P < 0.001). Presence of fatigue was underreported by physicians (reported in only 32% of patients who self-reported fatigue). CONCLUSION: Prevalence of patient-reported fatigue was high among patients with PsA and underrecognized by physicians. Fatigue severity was associated with altered physical functioning, work productivity, and HRQOL.

Patient and physician perspectives on alopecia areata: A real-world assessment of severity and burden in Japan.

The criteria used by physicians to assess alopecia areata severity and its associated burden from the patients' point of view are not well understood. We aimed to understand physician-assessed determinants of disease severity, factors associated with severity, patient-physician concordance, and patient-reported burden by severity. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Alopecia Areata Disease Specific Programme™, a point-in-time survey of dermatologists and their alopecia areata patients in real-world practice in Japan conducted between January and March 2021. Patients were categorized into three groups by current disease severity according to physician subjective assessment: mild, moderate, or severe. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were described within and compared between the three patient groups. Our study of 97 dermatologists and 587 patients found overall scalp hair loss was the most important factor considered by physicians in determining disease severity. More severe disease was associated with loss of eyebrow hair, eyelashes, and hair loss from other body areas. Agreement on disease severity between physicians and patients was moderate. From the patient perspective, greater severity of alopecia areata was associated with greater anxiety and depression, with lower work productivity and worse quality of life. Our study provides insights into which factors physicians use to determine alopecia areata severity, how physician and patient severity assessments compare, and the burden of alopecia areata on patients.

Real-world management of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis differs from clinical practice guideline recommendations and across regions.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Despite availability of diagnostic and management reference guidelines outlining standard of care for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), national and regional guidelines are lacking, resulting in variations in patient management between regions. We retrospectively analyzed patient characteristics and management data from the Adelphi Real World NASH Disease Specific Programme™ for patients with NASH in the EU5, Canada, and the Middle East to identify gaps between real-world practice and that advocated by reference guidelines, irrespective of clinician awareness or consultation of guidelines. METHODS: We performed an analysis of physicians (hepatologists, gastroenterologists, diabetologists) and their patients diagnosed with NASH. Physicians completed patient record forms for the next 5 consulting patients, collecting information on patient care, including diagnosis and disease management. RESULTS: A total of 429 physicians provided data for 2,267 patients with NASH (EU5, n = 1,844; Canada, n = 130; Middle East, n = 293). Patient age, physician-defined fibrosis stage, comorbidities and symptoms, and diagnostic testing practices highlighted statistically significant differences across regions. Substantial disconnects between reference guidelines and real-world practice were observed. Use of liver function tests, non-invasive tests (e.g. ultrasound and transient elastography), and tests to exclude other conditions was suboptimal. Although lifestyle advice was widely provided, patients were less commonly referred to diet, exercise, and lifestyle specialists. Two-thirds of patients were receiving off-label treatment for NASH or associated underlying conditions with the aim of improving NASH, most commonly statins, metformin, and vitamin E. CONCLUSION: Real-world NASH management approaches differ across regions and from proposed standard of care represented by reference multidisciplinary guidelines. Establishment and awareness of, and adherence to regional and national guidelines may improve identification and management of patients with NASH and potentially improve outcomes in this population. LAY SUMMARY: Although reference guidelines are available to guide the management of patients with NASH, these are not widely used and there is a lack of national guidelines. Our study shows how clinical practice in the EU, Canada, and Middle East differs from proposed standard of care, particularly relating to how patients are diagnosed and treated. Wider establishment of, awareness of, and reference to guidelines may improve how physicians identify and manage patients with NASH.

Symptom burden of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with intense and persistent pruritus. OBJECTIVES: To examine associations between AD symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe AD. MATERIALS & METHODS: Patient chart and survey data from physicians within Europe were derived from the Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programme (Q3 2019-Q2 2020). HRQoL measures included Euro-Qol 5-dimension, 3-level, questionnaire; Dermatology Life Quality Index; and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Atopic Dermatitis questionnaire. Data were evaluated using descriptive statistics and generalized linear models. RESULTS: Of 631 patients, 90.1%, 49.3%, 18.5% and 17.7% reported pruritus, sleep disruption, anxiety and depression, respectively. Adjusted analyses indicated an increased frequency of symptoms associated with worse HRQoL and greater work/activity impairments, particularly for patients with pruritus and sleep disruption. CONCLUSION: Reductions in symptom frequency may have important implications for improving the overall health of patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Inadequate Disease Control, Treatment Dissatisfaction, and Quality-of-Life Impairments Among US Patients Receiving Topical Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) experience burdensome symptoms and impaired quality of life (QoL). The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of topical AD therapies on disease control, physician and patient treatment satisfaction, and QoL in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective, point-in-time study of physician-completed medical records and patient surveys drawn from two Adelphi AD Disease Specific Programmes™ (1. adults ≥ 18 years old; 2. pediatrics ≤ 17 years old) in the USA. Eligible physicians completed patient record forms and provided disease control assessments. Physicians and matched patients were surveyed regarding their satisfaction with current treatment. Patient-reported outcomes included the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Children's DLQI (CDLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 394 adult (topicals only, n = 284; topical plus systemic, n = 110) and 144 adolescent (aged 12-17 years; topicals only, n = 114; topical plus systemic, n = 30) patients who had received their current treatment for at least 1 month were included. Overall, 24.5% of patients had physician-reported uncontrolled disease (adults, 22.8%; adolescents, 29.2%). Rates of physician- and patient-reported dissatisfaction with current treatment were 32.0% (adults, 28.2%; adolescents, 42.4%) and 24.8% (adults, 24.0%; adolescents, 26.8%), respectively, and were higher for patients with uncontrolled versus controlled disease. Poorer disease control and higher rates of treatment dissatisfaction were generally reported among patients receiving topical plus systemic therapy versus topicals alone. Patients with uncontrolled versus controlled disease reported more impairment in the DLQI, CDLQI, POEM, and WPAI (P < 0.05 for all), with generally greater impairments observed among patients on topical plus systemic therapy versus topicals alone. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving topical AD therapies experienced uncontrolled disease and reported decreased overall functioning and lower QoL. An unmet need for topical AD treatments that improve disease control and patient outcomes exists.

Atopic dermatitis (or eczema) is a common skin condition that causes dry, cracked, and itchy skin. Patients are frequently prescribed topical therapy, such as ointments and creams, to apply directly to the affected skin. Additionally, patients may be prescribed systemic therapies, which are oral or injectable medications that work throughout the entire body. This study included 394 adults and 144 adolescents (aged 12­17 years) with atopic dermatitis. All patients in the study were receiving topical therapy, and some received both topical and systemic therapy. The goal of the study was to evaluate how satisfied patients and their doctors were with current treatment and to learn how patients in the study felt about their quality of life. Patients and their doctors completed surveys that asked about feelings, symptoms, and whether their condition affects their work. The study results showed that patients had high levels of dissatisfaction with their treatment. Doctors reported that between one-fifth and one-quarter of adult patients and up to one-half of adolescent patients had uncontrolled disease (defined as changeable or worsening). Patients with uncontrolled disease reported higher dissatisfaction with their therapy and a negative outlook on their quality of life versus those with controlled disease (defined as stable or improving by their doctors). In summary, doctors and their patients currently using topical medications to treat atopic dermatitis reported that treatments were not working well enough and that uncontrolled disease was negatively affecting patients' quality of life and work, indicating that additional treatment options are needed.

Health-Related Quality of Life Among Patients With HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to characterize health-related quality of life (HRQOL) among patients diagnosed with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) breast cancer. METHODS: A multinational (United States, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and United Kingdom) study of patients diagnosed with stage I to III HR+/HER2- breast cancer, either receiving adjuvant treatment or under postadjuvant surveillance, was conducted between June and October 2019. Patients were identified by their consulting physician and invited to complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and the EQ-5D-5L pen and paper questionnaires. EQ-5D-5L index scores were derived by using available country-specific health state value sets, where available, and numerically compared with general population scores derived from published normative and population data. Descriptive summary statistics were reported for FACT-B, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) (total and specific subscales), the EQ-5D index scores, and the EQ-VAS scores for each country. Results were stratified according to disease-free treatment status (active adjuvant treatment or postadjuvant surveillance), age (25-44, 45-54, 55-64, or ≥65 years), stage (I, II, or III), and menopausal status at the time of questionnaire completion (pre-/peri-menopausal or postmenopausal). FINDINGS: Overall, 1110 patients completed the HRQOL questionnaires (mean age, 59 years; 79% active adjuvant treatment, and 21% under surveillance postadjuvant treatment at time of questionnaire administration; 31% stage I, 48% stage II, and 20% stage III at diagnosis). Of these, 1102 completed the FACT-B and 1083 completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. The mean (SD) FACT-B total score was 99.0 (21.9). The mean FACT-G total score was 72.5 (17.8), which was comparable to the published normative score. The mean EQ-5D index and EQ-VAS scores for each country were similar to corresponding population means; EQ-5D index scores ranged from 0.842 (0.098) in Japan to 0.916 (0.109) in France, and EQ-VAS scores from 68.0 (18.4) in Germany to 78.6 (16.4) in the United States. In addition, mean scores were comparable between the active adjuvant treatment and postadjuvant surveillance groups for the FACT-B total (99.4 [22.5] and 97.7 [19.7], respectively), FACT-G total (72.8 [18.3] and 71.3 [16.0]), EQ-5D index score (0.868 [0.135] and 0.869 [0.142]), and EQ-VAS (74.9 [17.2] and 74.4 [16.1]). IMPLICATIONS: Patient-reported HRQOL among patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer who were disease-free was high, with reported scores comparable to normative scores. These results improve our understanding of HRQOL among patients with early disease and may facilitate future studies examining the potential impact of adjuvant treatment and disease recurrence, including metastasis.